Consequences of Actions from Professional Athletes

Where Are the Jocks for Justice” by Kelly Candaele and Peter Dreier took a look into Adonal Foyle’s battle to change the current political system. When most athletes were spending money to rebuild playgrounds or schools, or visiting sick children in the hospital, Foyle was running a grassroots group called Democracy Matters. Democracy Matters wanted to educate children about politics, push them to vote, and bring pressure to change the current political system. Foyle clearly wanted to make a change in society and earned a lot of praise for his battle against the political system. However, not all professional athletes have been given the same praise.

In 2003, in the midst of the conflict between the United States and Iraq, Steve Nash, an NBA all-star, wore a shirt that read, “No War. Shoot for Peace.” Nash was trying to be an activist and suggest change in the world. Nash clearly spoke out that he felt in 2013, violence should no longer be used as a means of conflict resolution. However, many sports columnists responded poorly to the attempt by Nash to state his political views to society. Even fellow athlete David Robinson, a former naval officer and NBA player, spoke out against Nash. I found it interesting that Nash was just trying to suggest a change in society, but was ridiculed. Foyle and Nash are in the minority of athletes who have expressed political views while in the public eye as a profession athlete. I believe athletes should be free to express their political views and suggest a positive change in the world.

Recently, members of the St. Louis Rams have chosen to express there views on the Ferguson Trial. The St. Louis Rams walked out to the field with there hands up in the air. This has been used as an image for hands up, don’t shoot in the midst of the Ferguson protests. The players on the Rams clearly felt that the officer Darren Wilson acted inappropriately and was racial profiling African Americans. Immediately following the protest by the Rams, the St. Louis police department spoke out in anger. The police department was angered that the Rams staff was pressing the police force to offer extra protection for players; meanwhile members of the Rams were acting out against the officers. I believe the police officers should not have spoke out agains the Rams. Although they are professional athletes and on national television, they still have the right to express there political opinions. The Rams players wanted to influence change and put an end to racial profiling. Athletes are the center of attention and should be supported for being an activist because it can lead to positive change in society.

Athletes being role models and the effect of their actions on society have been a constant debate. I believe athletes should be allowed to express their political views without being ridiculed by society. Steve Nash was trying to advocate for peace. Adonal Foyle clearly was trying to stop corruption of campaign finances before expressing his opinions. The St. Louis Rams were just trying to put an end to racial profiling and violence. In the article, “Where are the Jocks For Justice,” the authors mentioned many instances where athletes trying to be activist have been ridiculed. Whether it be violence activism or political corruption activism, or any other type of activism, athletes should be encouraged to state there political views because it can benefit society.

2 thoughts on “Consequences of Actions from Professional Athletes

  1. Although I don’t disagree with a lot of the points you make in this post, I feel professional athletes have a right to voice (or symbolize) their political afflictions. I’m not saying I agree with Stedman Bailey and the other Ram player/demonstrators, but if athletes were not given the platform or allowance to voice publicly their off-the-field- stances there would never have been John Carlos and Tommy Smith’s fist at the 1968 olympics, or the “Los Suns” movement, or more.


  2. I believe with many ideas here, but when it comes to professional sports in the stadium, on the time of the team they are playing for they are not just representing themselves, they are representing a program. When you sign a contract and come play football you are basically showing up for work. In an office place it would probably be inappropriate to where ferguson shirt, or anything of the like is inappropriate.


Comments are closed.