Possibly the most controversial issue in the U.S. right now, the shooting of Michael Brown has had citizens and the people of Ferguson, Missouri in uproar the past couple months. As many people know, Michael Brown raised his arms as a gesture meaning “don’t shoot,” but police officer Darren Wilson shot and killed Mr. Brown, thinking that his life was threatened in some way, despite the fact that Mr. Brown was unarmed. Since then, riots and protests have taken place in Ferguson, as well as cities and towns all over the country. Some believe that Officer Wilson shot as a result of racism, while others believe it truly was because he felt threatened. Regardless, Officer Wilson was not indicted, which led to violent protests and the National Guard coming to Ferguson to control the riots (Davey and Bosman). Because of the shooting in Ferguson, the unresolved issue of racism has been the topic of debate throughout the nation. People all over the country are speaking out about this issue and how they feel, including professional athletes. Continue reading
Growing up in the Detroit area, I have had the privilege of watching one of the greatest hockey teams in the NHL. The Detroit Red Wings are a part of the original six, have won eleven Stanley Cups, and hold the longest post season streak in professional sports at 23. Throughout my life, I have grown to be a passionate hockey fan, and even more so a Red Wings fan.
So far this year, I have been to several Red Wings games, as well as a few Michigan hockey games. After experiencing the atmosphere and game play at both Yost Arena and the Joe Louis Arena, I have noticed many differences and similarities between the two teams. I can feel the passion and dedication the players have for the sport in both teams. Both crowds are into the game, yelling chants and cheering for their team. The Wings have a larger crowd, but the Wolverines have a much rowdier crowd. All in all, I experienced a love for hockey and a desire to win in both arenas. On the surface, I saw no difference between the amateurs and the professionals.
Everywhere you go in the United States, you are likely going to see a lot of cars. Whenever we go somewhere beyond walking distance, we simply grab the keys and drive off. Cars play an important role in American lives, being our primary mode of transportation. With the economy coming out of a recession, people are buying new cars again at all time highs. According to the New York Daily News, 15.6 million vehicles were sold in the United States in 2013, eight percent more than the previous year (NY Daily News). Needless to say, the auto industry is doing well and the economy is certainly improving. Continue reading
On October 22, 2014, a Canadian soldier was shot and killed while standing guard at a war memorial in Ottawa, Ontario. There were then shots fired inside Parliament as well, targeting the nations Capital. The media reported that there were up to three gunmen involved in this shooting, which resulted in two people wounded and two men killed, one of which was one of the shooters (Gillies). The city of Ottawa is in shock, and the police have warned people downtown to “stay away from windows and rooftops” (Gillies). Canadian officials are currently doing everything they can to find the remaining shooters, and any others involved. Continue reading
For the longest time, sports have been thought of as a way to get away from work and simply enjoy the simplicity of sports as a whole, whether that be through the spectator role or as a player. Either way, sports have generally been seen as a way to get away from things like mathematics and anything else that would be described as work. In recent years, however, professional sports have become increasingly popular, drawing in millions of spectators. The world of sports is no longer solely about play, but also about the business of the sport and the profits associated with a team’s image. With the immense popularity in professional sports, many people are now questioning whether or not the money and business associated with teams is taking the play out sports. Continue reading
Every child is urged to go to college these days. I was always under the impression that college is the key to being successful in life. Meanwhile, I find my step dad to be very successful, and he didn’t have a college degree. Come to think of it, there are people all around me that didn’t go to college, yet they seem pretty happy. So this got me wondering, is college really necessary?
In the article Live and Learn by Louis Menand, there are three theories proposed concerning college. The first theory says that only the best students can go to college. It suggests that college is a four year intelligence test to filter out those who are not smart enough to be successful. The second theory states that college is intended to give students a well rounded education, creating a society of like-minded individuals. The third theory, the theory that I believe to be ideal, states that college is meant to give people the skills they need to work in a certain profession, and that occupations should only require vocational school or certain college classes to be taken. This theory says that not everyone should go to college, just the people that pursue a profession that requires the skills acquired through a college education.
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the majority of students coming out of high school end up going to college. Many of these students are only going to college because they were told they have to, not necessarily because they want to. In the past, people would go to college in order to work in elite professions, such as becoming a doctor or lawyer. Otherwise, most people could get a decent job right out of high school. However, times have changed. Now it seems as if you need a college degree in order to get a decent job. The problem is that students are now being told that they have to go to college, regardless of what they actually want to do for a career. Plumbers and artists and electricians and mechanics are all going to college for what? They only need to learn certain skills to be successful in their careers. This is why I support Menand’s third theory. It is practical. It is efficient. It will save money.
People going into professions that only require certain skills should only have to learn those skills, not spend four years learning about things that might not matter in their careers. My step father, for instance, is a firefighter and a paramedic. He started his career without a college degree. He took some classes and worked hard to pass his tests and earn his medic’s license (which has a 95% confidence requirement). He became a successful fireman and has now worked for over twenty years with his department. Now the department requires that new applicants have a bachelors degree in order to get hired in. My step dad even had to get a bachelors degree in order to become a captain. It took him six years to get his bachelors degree, for he was working full time and supporting a family of five at the same time. The majority of the classes he took were not related to his job at all, such as the humanities classes he had to take, or the golfing class he took to fulfill a PE requirement. Not only was he wasting his time in these classes, but both the township and my step dad spent money on these classes. My step dad didn’t need to know about other religions or how to do calculus to become move on as a firefighter, but he was forced to. There are thousands of people in the same situation.
College has become a gimmick, a way for public and private institutions to make billions of dollars just because people think they have to go to college. Unfortunately, people really do need a degree if they want to be compete with other workers. However, it doesn’t have to be this way. Employers should stop requiring college degrees unless the material is actually necessary for that specific job. People should be required to take certain classes or learn certain skills for their jobs. Not everyone needs to go to college in order to do their job well. Society is convinced that college will lead to success, meanwhile there are lots of people coming out of college without a good paying job. Theory three would save people from going to college when they don’t have to. Unlike the first two theories, theory three prevents people from spending four years in college before finding out exactly what they want to become. Getting jobs shouldn’t be determined by who has the biggest diploma, it should be about who has the skills needed to be productive in that profession.
I found Menand’s third theory to be very ideal and productive compared to the way college currently impacts our society. My point here is that college is not a necessity for everyone. Menand’s article forced me to question whether I need to go to college, and I hope that this will allow others to question their education. I am a firm supporter of the third theory, but I would love for others to make their own theories as well. There are certainly more theories than the three that Louis Menand mentioned, but theory three sounded to me like it would work. As I said before, it is something that is practical. College should not be something that can hurt people. It should only benefit those who truly need it.